Writers and Other Contrinutors Welcome

The Editor of this blog invites other contributors of lead articles, art and poetry etc. Photos welcome. Subject to approval of content etc. While editorially this is a left wing blog with a radical perspective, other opinion is of course welcome to the comments section. Everything being subject to moderator approval of approptiateness to this site.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Child labour in early capitalism - USA

TILMA: The Neocon Agenda
Completing the Destruction of The Post-WW2 Socialized Capitalist State
by Coyote

There is no real mystery or rocket science here, to the agenda that underlies the recently signed TILMA Agreement between British Columbia and Alberta, or what the intentions are of the two neo-conservative administrations of these two western provinces, one nominally “Liberal” and the other overtly “Conservative”. The hope additionally being expressed by the parties that it will soon include Saskatchewan and spread westward across the entire country. Indeed, “Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty has already discussed bringing TILMA to his province with B.C. Premier Gordon Campbell, while groups such as the Canada West Foundation are pressing Saskatchewan and Manitoba to join the agreement.” ( Source from an article by Wayne Peppard, in a special written for the Globe and Mail.).

All that it is really necessary to know and understand are the basics of the deal, and the essential political/ideological characters of the parties to the agreement, if one does not already.

“TILMA is the BC/Alberta Trade, Investment, and Labour Mobility Agreement. This agreement, which goes far beyond existing trade agreements, was signed by British Columbia and Alberta in April, 2006, after zero consultation with the general public. Although few people realize it even exists, it will come into effect in April, 2007. “

But according to Ellen Gould a consultant who has advised various local governments, consumer groups and other organizations on the potential impacts of trade agreements, TILMA’s purpose, in the spirit and intent of NAFTA and the NAU at the level of bi-lateral relations internationally, between Canada and the US, is really much more far reaching and sinister in its implications for the economy, the Canadian and provincial state apparatus, and the hereto relatively more benign dominant ideology which has underpinned Western World Capitalism since the end of WW 2: being the ideological notion of a Socialized Capitalism. This notion hereto even, having enjoyed generally wide support amongst the working class and other of its lower class strata, here and in Western Europe.

“TILMA limits government’s ability to govern at both the provincial and local levels. The agreement is essentially a long list of things governments will be prohibited from doing, regardless of whether they are acting completely within their jurisdiction. Even if a majority of citizens in a province are demanding a new government initiative, the government will be blocked from acting if the initiative would conflict with TILMA. TILMA enables private investors to challenge governments, allowing commercial interests to trump the public good.”

Hmmm. Beginning to sound familiar of the neoconservative capitalism period and the times as we have all come to know it since the late 1970s?

Ellen Gould argues that Canada’s most ideologically right-wing provincial governments have, in fact, joined forces in an agreement that erodes their own powers- ,and now they are trying to sell other provinces on the deal. Ellen Gould argues that the rest of Canada would be well-advised to reject the deal as an attack on their very right to govern.

So why would right wing governments erode their own powers and ability to govern, you might well ask?

Most succinctly put, leave it to private enterprise. Particularly global/continental corporate enterprise of course.

Despite the bullshit Western Canada boosterism being used to sell the agreement to an unsuspecting public. its real intent is to complete the destruction of the old Socialized Capitalism State that arose out of the working of even then class limited democracy, in Post-WW2 western capitalist societies-, and to replace it with a new kind of gangster/fascist state model, isolated and “protected” from the influence of the people and their organizations, and beholden only to corporatist interests and imperatives. (Which is really not a “new” model at all, of course, but a return in fact to a much older model of Dickensian Era capitalism such as existed during and before the Victorian period .)

On a recent CBC news programme I listened to within the last couple of days, for example, getting public reaction around the most recent Harper Conservative government’s budget, one especially neocon representative, whose name and organization I cannot recall at the moment, was really pissed at even the few crumbs it tossed to the public, in order as he rightly claimed, “…to buy the next election.”

What he and his conservative businessmen’s group were advocating for was, the making it illegal for any government, six months in advance of an election (during a period when, especially in the case of a minority government, “the people’s” influence is at its highest, with the best opportunity to wring concessions out of a majority seeking government) to bring in any new social legislation or spending programmes. The intent being to further staunch the people’s influence and benefit during a period of capitalist state vulnerability, within even the current limited democracy potential anyway, and prevent it making concession to the ordinary citizenry.
TILMA is fundamentally that kind of legislation. It is to tie the hands of the Capitalist State and its functioning, to limit its scope for serving “the peoples” interest, and to put much of the decision making and ability to function for the good of “all society”, such as had previously existed in the now passing Socialized State model, into the hands of the new corporate “private enterprise” sacred cow.

Again as consultant Ellen Gould said in a recent article:

“A study done for the BC government in the late 1990s pointed out that trade barriers among the provinces are actually very low, meaning that, contrary to the recent claims of Hansen and Mar, “efforts to liberalize inter-provincial trade will have almost no effect on inter-provincial trade flows.” Any projections of TILMA-related economic growth are, consequently, iffy at best. The agreement is certain, on the other hand, to result in deregulation, private sector challenges to government programs and policies, and the termination of economic development initiatives.

Far from being a recipe for prosperity or a stronger Canadian union, this agreement in fact represents a major step towards deep integration with the US—the process of harmonizing Canadian and US policies and regulations.”

The full reality is that TILMA is an extension of the NAFTA and North American Union process already well underway in this country. Indeed, TILMA is in fact more dangerous than NAFTA in its threat to, at least, even nominally democratically controlled capitalist governments.

“Already, NAFTA suits launched by private investors have meant that Canada has had to pay millions of dollars in compensation because it refused to export PCBs (which would have been a violation of its international environmental commitments). And the Canadian government is now in danger of losing a NAFTA challenge to Canada Post launched by UPS, the American parcel delivery firm. Less obvious is the damage done by the “chill effect” from the threat of investor lawsuits under NAFTA, such as when the federal government backed away from requiring plain-paper packaging of cigarettes or when Ontario and New Brunswick were dissuaded from introducing public auto insurance.

TILMA, however, goes even further than NAFTA in creating legal jeopardy for governments. The grounds that private investors can sue over are limited in NAFTA to clauses in Chapter 11 (investment) and Chapter 15 (state enterprises). In contrast, a private investor can take a government to a TILMA dispute panel over “any matter regarding the interpretation or application of this Agreement” (emphasis added). “

TILMA is but one more extremely dangerous step in the process begun with NAFTA in the “harmonizing” of the regulation and legal regime of this country with that of the US Empire. Indeed, as we have seen it is more really a further “deregulation” step, designed to facilitate the absorption and burying of this country into the US initiated greater North American Union.

TILMA is but one more nail in the coffin of the notion of an independent and self-sufficient Canada , possessed of its own sovereign State, and possessed of the powers to serve its own people’s interest, and be subject to their will.

This is, simply put, a traitorous crime being committed against this country and our people, in the name of a goddamn continental, corporatist serving “free enterprise”.

Girl child factory labour in early capitalist USA



Larry Gambone said...

What they are doing is closing the door on reform. The capitalist state after the war had no such restrictions and could thus engineer reforms which created the Fordist mass consumer society. This was also a time of mass capitalist growth, engendered in large measure by the massive destruction of WW2. Today we are faced with several potential disasters - financial meltdown in the US,end of the empire, peak oil, and global warming. At the same time they have closed the door on reform with NAFTA TILMA etc. Basically the system is writing its own death warrent. Unable to enact necessary reforms, there can only be a social explosion.

mr e said...

How come your called freedom of speech but you got comment moderation enabled? kinda a contradiction in terms, no?

kootcoot said...

mr e, sorry about the moderation, but there was a racist, neo-nazi who couldn't seem to say much about much other than perversions and toilet issues. Watch for a front page posting about this guy and why we had to resort to moderation, for awhile anyway.

I keep saying that it will be up tonight or tomorrow, and I'm sticking with the story, even tho it keeps getting to be another tonight and a new tomorrow.

lynn said...

"Basically the system is writing its own death warrent. Unable to enact necessary reforms, there can only be a social explosion."

Exactly, Larry. Well said.

The system has become an unfeeling death machine, knocked senseless, and blindered by the greed and self-interest that fuels it now. Suicidal really. As you state: it is "unable to exact necessary reforms" (through the ability to govern)...and thus it is also unable to save itself.

And yet the neo-cons cannot see this - that they are their own worst enemy. This new model of the gangster-fascist state that Coyote refers to in his article can only perceive the human element as an obstacle to be removed...an impediment to their sacred "commercial interests"...and yet they are unable to see that in the end that mercenary perception will destroy them as well.

These guys, identify more with the machine now than with humanity. And so charmed are they by its lethal whims that these lowly, subservient creatures now willingly revel in their impotency.

mr e said...

From what I have read though, it was you guys that have used a lot of profane abuse, its hard to see the context because of all the deletions but surely deleting this guys comments does not auger in favour of freedom of speech or balance?

Anonymous said...

What a hilarious post. Oooh how scary, the evil Nafta and her twin sister Tilma.

Ha ha, you guys must be hunkered down in a bunker somewhere waiting for the invasion of the body snatchers.

Larry Gambone said...

Nonnymouse, show us then how they are not a problem. Show us why we should all bow down in front of the Corportate State.

lynn said...

Yeah, nonnymouse, tell us why you kneel so obediently before your sacred Corporate State. Do its cheezy gods answer your cheezy prayers? Life lived as one big extended infomercial, eh nonnymouse?

Coyote said...

Have something actual to say here, that seriously challenges, yes even us, and actually contributes to the discussion, there is no problem, and we have always let even wingnut opinion in here. But freedom of speech is NOT an absolute. You don't get to come in here and simply take dump, hurl nothing but insults, and get to expect we will view that as freedom of speech.

Cussing or ideas different from our own, even the most extreme right wing, but you don't get to call women here "slags", or simply to insult and not actually have anything to say. If you are just an Elliot from Tyee, for example, we'll blow you off just like snot.

That's why "moderation" is on here, and will stay on, until you wingnuts get that message. It ensures freedom of speech for those who actually have something to say, be they from left, right or wherever.

Coyote said...

Cussin', or foul language as you might call it Mr e, is not the issue. The issue is, does one have anything really new or substantial to say that contributes or helps develop a dialouge around that language, be it hoity toity or language foul.

I do a great deal of cussin' myself, and don't apologize for that, but you catch me referring to women as "slags", or you catch me attempting to terrorize women or anyone else by playing with their identities, be they anonymous, using a pseudonym or their actual names, or the information around their identities, you are fucking out of here.

My sensibilities are not the least tender, or easily offended, but you pose a security issue to me or anyone else here, or you come in here to not actually engage in a give and take dialouge, but merely cat call and take the classic right wingnut troll dump in here, and attempt to use us as your asswipe-, again, you are fucking out of here.
That is NOT freedom of speech, but something quite different.

You don't like those provisos, then stay in your own nutbar troll blog bailiwick.

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
eco vacations costa rica said...

hi all, for weeks, I've been following your blog about Completing the Destruction of The Post-WW2 Socialized Capitalist State, I love the approach that you give to this subject, thank you very much!